Dear friends,
Findings of the inquiry officer in the inquiry report is not binding on the disciplinary authority. He may also disagree with the findings of I.O. But mostly the disciplinary authority comes to a conclusion about the quantum of penalty to be imposed on the charged official based on the report. Before awarding penalty the disciplinary authority should look into the findings whether the evaluation of evidence is done in proper manner and as per rules and procedures.
In case of disagreement he may order for further inquiry on certain points on which he opined differently but not order for fresh inquiry with another I.O.
Also the disciplinary authority can not order for fresh inquiry merely on the ground that the findings of the I.O is favourable to the charged official even though the report is prepared in accordance with rules and procedures.
The disciplinary authority is obliged to furnish the IR copy to the charged official who is required to submit his representation within fifteen days.
The disciplinary authority shall consider the representation and based on the findings of the inquiry report decide the quantum of penalty to be awarded ,that is major or minor penalty. Before awarding penalty the recommendations of UPSC or CVC will also be taken into account.
The final order must be a speaking order and it must be communicated to the charged official in person as far as possible or sent through regd.post .
Dear friends ,
Here I have not posted about Rule-16 procedure elobarately but defined briefly in previous post already.
Now I wish to post some Tamil films video clippings on court scenes in academic interest .
01. Disproving the prosecution material documentary evidence by asking leading questions in cross examination by the defence lawyer.
A scene from the Tamil film " Mounam Sammatham" through the link below.
https://youtu.be/PxzufmG-RD4
02. Disproving the prosecution material witness evidence by asking leading questions in cross examination by the defence lawyer.
A scene from the Tamil film " Mounam Sammatham" through the link below.
https://youtu.be/1eKqSs2oaP8
03.As per rule 14(15) of CCS CCA Rules 1965 additional evidence on behalf of disciplinary authority may be included by the P.O. during the inquiry with the permission of I.O. even though it was not listed in the charge sheet.And in such a case the copy of the list to be served to the charged official for rebuttal and the inquiry must be adjourned for three days.
For this similarity a scene from the Tamil film " Gouravam" video clippings link is given below.
https://youtu.be/JN2dmUf9IEQ
4.The final sum upping the case by P.O and defence asst of their cases on closing the inquiry and order of disciplinary authority .
For this similarity a scene from the Tamil film "POURNAMI ALAIGAL" video clippings link is given below.
https://youtu.be/fglYOhTRfuk
Tenkasi . with loving greetings
19.12.2018. G.Mariappan
Findings of the inquiry officer in the inquiry report is not binding on the disciplinary authority. He may also disagree with the findings of I.O. But mostly the disciplinary authority comes to a conclusion about the quantum of penalty to be imposed on the charged official based on the report. Before awarding penalty the disciplinary authority should look into the findings whether the evaluation of evidence is done in proper manner and as per rules and procedures.
In case of disagreement he may order for further inquiry on certain points on which he opined differently but not order for fresh inquiry with another I.O.
Also the disciplinary authority can not order for fresh inquiry merely on the ground that the findings of the I.O is favourable to the charged official even though the report is prepared in accordance with rules and procedures.
The disciplinary authority is obliged to furnish the IR copy to the charged official who is required to submit his representation within fifteen days.
The disciplinary authority shall consider the representation and based on the findings of the inquiry report decide the quantum of penalty to be awarded ,that is major or minor penalty. Before awarding penalty the recommendations of UPSC or CVC will also be taken into account.
The final order must be a speaking order and it must be communicated to the charged official in person as far as possible or sent through regd.post .
Dear friends ,
Here I have not posted about Rule-16 procedure elobarately but defined briefly in previous post already.
Now I wish to post some Tamil films video clippings on court scenes in academic interest .
01. Disproving the prosecution material documentary evidence by asking leading questions in cross examination by the defence lawyer.
A scene from the Tamil film " Mounam Sammatham" through the link below.
https://youtu.be/PxzufmG-RD4
02. Disproving the prosecution material witness evidence by asking leading questions in cross examination by the defence lawyer.
A scene from the Tamil film " Mounam Sammatham" through the link below.
https://youtu.be/1eKqSs2oaP8
03.As per rule 14(15) of CCS CCA Rules 1965 additional evidence on behalf of disciplinary authority may be included by the P.O. during the inquiry with the permission of I.O. even though it was not listed in the charge sheet.And in such a case the copy of the list to be served to the charged official for rebuttal and the inquiry must be adjourned for three days.
For this similarity a scene from the Tamil film " Gouravam" video clippings link is given below.
https://youtu.be/JN2dmUf9IEQ
4.The final sum upping the case by P.O and defence asst of their cases on closing the inquiry and order of disciplinary authority .
For this similarity a scene from the Tamil film "POURNAMI ALAIGAL" video clippings link is given below.
https://youtu.be/fglYOhTRfuk
Tenkasi . with loving greetings
19.12.2018. G.Mariappan
No comments:
Post a Comment